File down site

what's webhard?

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

웹하드 순위 Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

You should share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not account for cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.



There are the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which might be uploaded from the free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.